Stowell & Friedman, Ltd. is a boutique law firm dedicated to defending employees' civil rights. We have successfully litigated cases that challenge nearly every form of adverse employment action, from failure to hire to discriminatory pay practices, harassment, denial of promotion and termination. Stowell & Friedman, Ltd. has represented thousands of employees and recovered over $600,000,000 in damages for victims of discrimination and other unlawful conduct. Stowell & Friedman, Ltd. achieves results for its clients by drawing upon the vast knowledge, diversity, experience, passion, creativity, and collaboration that exists within our firm.
"Certainly there have been no more competent counsel that I've ever had in a case than have appeared here on behalf of the plaintiffs and the defendant. Their opinion is given a lot of weight by this Court."
Honorable Ruben Castillo
Cremin, et al. v. Merrill Lynch
"Your lawyers have done an outstanding job. Linda Friedman has really persevered on your behalf, on everyone's behalf in the class, beyond what any ordinary lawyer could do. She's an outstanding trial lawyer. She's an outstanding appellate lawyer. She's an outstanding person."
HONORABLE JAMES F. HOLDERMAN
Biondo, et al. v. City of Chicago
Stowell & Friedman, Ltd. represents 16 named plaintiffs seeking classwide relief for a putative nationwide class of African American Financial Advisors harmed by racially discriminatory policies that result in job segregation, lower compensation, and other injuries.
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals accepted but has not yet ruled on plaintiffs' appeal of the District Court's denial of class certification. For information regarding McReynolds et al. v. Merrill Lynch click here
Stowell & Friedman, Ltd. represents Merrill Lynch Client Associates ("CAs") who seek to represent CAs nationwide who worked overtime for the firm but were not paid lawful wages for the work they performed. To view the Martignago et al v. Merrill Lynch complaint, please click here
If you are or were employed as a Sales Assistant at Merrill Lynch and wish to speak to an attorney about the Martignago case and your rights, please contact us.
Who We Are
Stowell & Friedman, Ltd. is dedicated to defending employees' civil rights. We have successfully litigated cases that challenge nearly every form of adverse employment action, from failure to hire to discriminatory pay practices, harassment, denial of promotion and termination. Stowell & Friedman, Ltd. has represented thousands of employees and recovered over $600,000,000 in damages for victims of discrimination and other unlawful conduct. Stowell & Friedman, Ltd. achieves results for its clients by drawing upon the vast knowledge, diversity, experience, passion, creativity, and collaboration that exists within our firm.
What We Do
Stowell & Friedman, Ltd. represents plaintiffs in individual, collective and class-action cases, with a particular concentration in sex and race employment discrimination and glass ceiling issues. The firm also has successfully represented victims of discrimination based on disability, pregnancy, age, national origin and sexual orientation and has successfully prosecuted claims for violations of the First Amendment, Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the U.S. Constitution, the Fair Labor Standards Act and the WARN Act. Where appropriate, the firm also represents employees in arbitration and mediation.
Consistent with its mission of advocating for workers on many fronts, the firm is active in lobbying and legislation to further protect civil rights in the workplace.
How We Do It
Stowell & Friedman, Ltd.'s nationally recognized litigation expertise draws upon the vast knowledge, diversity, experience, creativity, and collaboration of our team. Strong trial skills and experience are supported by advanced e-discovery and data analysis expertise. While unfortunately overt and egregious examples of sex and race discrimination still occur in the workplace, in many cases, discrimination has become more nuanced, requiring sophisticated e-discovery techniques and data analysis to successfully prove that discrimination has occurred. Stowell & Friedman, Ltd. has unique, expert resources to address discrimination in the modern workplace.
A National Reputation
Stowell & Friedman, Ltd. attorneys are also regularly invited to speak about legal and employment issues before local and national audiences.
"...an upward adjustment to the lodestar may be obtained in cases of 'exceptional' results, supported by both specific evidence on the record and detailed finding by the lower court.... The court finds this to be just such an exceptional case. Plaintiffs received monetary and injunctive relief affecting not merely themselves, but other present and future employees.... This was clearly not an ordinary sex-discrimination case with ordinary results."
Honorable John A. Nordberg
Cary et al. v. Chicago Housing Authority
Attorney
Staff
Linda D. Friedman
Founding and Managing Partner, 1989
Linda D. Friedman is a founding partner of Stowell & Friedman, Ltd. where she has practiced law since 1989. The firm has experienced considerable success in discrimination cases in which Ms. Friedman has been involved, including recovering well over $600 million for victims in settlements or verdicts.
Ms. Friedman was lead counsel on the statistical evidence hearing held in the case of Cremin v. Merrill Lynch, which resulted in a finding of class-wide pattern and practice of gender discrimination. The result was a settlement process that led to the ultimate recovery of hundreds of millions of dollars for women.
Ms. Friedman also has been counsel in other high-profile significant class and multiple plaintiff verdicts. In Biondo v. City of Chicago, four jury trials in a class-action race discrimination suit led to the recovery of full back pay, pension losses and promotions. In Dornbos v. County of Cook, a collective jury trial for violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act led to the recovery of wages for the county's bomb squad. In Roche v. City of Chicago, a collective action successfully challenged the City of Chicago's mandatory age requirement policy for approximately 50 plaintiffs who recovered lost wages. Finally, Martens v. Smith Barney, a national sexual harassment class action, recovered in excess of $100 million, including a diversity fund of $15 million.
"I believe her ability to communicate with the jury stems from the fact that she thinks like a person sitting in the jury box…on a level that is so understandable, so straightforward and so credible…Whenever she comes into my courtroom, I know the case will be handled well and her clients will receive the best representation possible" -- U.S. District Court Judge James F. Holderman
Ms. Friedman has represented clients nationwide, including in private mediation and arbitration, EEOC arbitration, Merit System Protection Board, federal district court jury and bench trials and appeals. She is a frequent speaker at bar association functions and Continuing Legal Education seminars. These have included the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Judicial Conference on alternative dispute resolution and the Practicing Law Institute in New York on ethical considerations in maintaining a multi-state or cross-border national law practice. She has been a speaker for presentations with the EEOC, ABA (subcommittee on securities litigation in New York and employment discrimination), SPIDER (Washington, D.C.) Insurance Bar, CBA, NELA and other organizations and academic institutions (Northwestern Business School, DePaul Law School, Vassar College).
Ms. Friedman also has appeared on CNBC and CNN and is a continuing commentator on legal stories for The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Fortune, Dow Jones, Reuters and Bloomberg, among others.
Ms. Friedman started her legal career as the first law clerk to the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber, U.S. District Court for the Northern District.
Ms. Friedman is most proud of the firm she founded where attorneys are not only trained in representing plaintiffs in civil rights litigation, but also acknowledge the importance of giving back to the community through pro bono services. For example, the firm represented a class of workers from Harvey, IL on a pro bono basis in a class action civil rights suit, which resulted in a settlement following a month-long difficult trial and appeal.
The firm also has participated with clients in lobbying for legislative change in Washington, D.C. for important civil rights laws such as the CRTRA and the Ledbetter bill. Ms. Friedman is pro bono counsel to the WNBA Chicago Sky Basketball team and a supporter of numerous charitable organizations which contribute to the development of civil rights and support disadvantaged persons.
Ms. Friedman has been selected as an Illinois Super Lawyer by Super Lawyers Magazine. She has been recognized as an Illinois Leading Lawyer by Leading Lawyers Network and voted by Leading Lawyers Network, as one of the "Top 50 Women Lawyers in Illinois," "Top 100 Leading Consumer Lawyers in Illinois" and "Top 10 Plaintiff's Employment Lawyers in Illinois." American Lawyer Media named Ms. Friedman one of the "Ten Most Influential Women Lawyers in Illinois." Ms. Friedman was recognized by Women Employed as one of 35 Champions for Change and the DePaul University College of Law Women's Alumni Association. She also formerly served on the Dean's Council to DePaul University College of Law. Ms. Friedman is AV Peer Review Rated by Lexis/Nexis Martindale-Hubbell – the highest possible rating for both ethical standards and legal ability.
Education
J.D. -- DePaul University College of Law
B.A. -- University of Colorado
Admissions
Illinois
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
U.S. Supreme Court
Activities
Chicago Bar Association
Illinois State Bar Association
Contact
Tel: 312-431-0888
Fax: 312-431-0228
lfriedman@sfltd.com
Mary Stowell
Founding Partner, Of Counsel
Mary Stowell is a founding partner of Stowell & Friedman, Ltd. and remains of Counsel to the Firm.
Ms. Stowell has handled single and multiple plaintiff cases and class actions and has obtained judgments and/or substantial settlements for clients on claims for age, race, sex, and pregnancy violations, First Amendment and Due Process Constitutional claims, W.A.R.N. Act, disability discrimination, sexual harassment, retaliation, wrongful discharge, Fair Labor Standards Act, breach of contract and defamation actions.
Further, she has developed a concentration in sex discrimination, sexual harassment, pregnancy and glass ceiling issues in the securities industry. Ms. Stowell successfully represented thousands of plaintiffs in civil rights actions, including the landmark nationwide sex discrimination class action lawsuits Cremin, et al. v. Merrill Lynch and Martens et al. v. Smith Barney.
Prior to founding Stowell & Friedman, Ltd., Ms. Stowell was an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Northern District Court of Chicago for the criminal division, spending the last years in the Special Prosecutions Divisions investigating and trying complex financial and political corruption cases, including complex RICO conspiracy, commodity, bank, tax and mail fraud cases.
Ms. Stowell has taught at both the Advocacy Institute, sponsored by the Department of Justice, while an Assistant U.S. Attorney, and the National Institute of Trial Advocacy, and is a member of the prestigious American College of Trial Lawyers.
Ms. Stowell has been recognized multiple times as an Illinois "Super Lawyer" by Super Lawyers Magazine. She has been recognized as an Illinois "Leading Lawyer" by Leading Lawyers Network and has been voted by Leading Lawyers Network as one of the "Top 100 Consumer Lawyers in Illinois," "Top 100 Leading Women Consumer Lawyers in Illinois" and "Top 10 Plaintiff's Employment Lawyers in Illinois." American Lawyer Media named Ms. Stowell one of the "Ten Most Influential Women Lawyers in Illinois." Ms. Stowell is AV Peer Review Rated by Lexis/Nexis Martindale-Hubbell – the highest possible rating for both ethical standards and legal ability.
Education
J.D. -- Northwestern University School of Law
B.A. -- University of Missouri at Kansas City
Admissions
Illinois
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit
U.S. Supreme Court
Activities
Chicago Bar Association
Illinois State Bar Association
Contact
Tel: 312-431-0888
Fax: 312-431-0228
mstowell@sfltd.com
Brenda H. Feis
Partner
Brenda H. Feis is a partner with Stowell & Friedman, Ltd. and is engaged in a broad-based employment law practice, with emphasis on complex employment litigation. She joined Stowell & Friedman, Ltd. in 2010, having previously been a partner with the law firm of Seyfarth Shaw, where she practiced management-side employment law for 25 years. Her experience representing both employees and employers has given her a unique perspective to fully assess the merits of each case. In addition to practicing law, Ms. Feis is an Adjunct Professor at Loyola Law School where she teaches employment litigation.
Ms. Feis has recovered millions of dollars for individual employees who have been damaged by unlawful employment practices. Ms. Feis' notable victories include negotiation of a multi-tiered nationwide settlement of sexual harassment claims involving thousands of female employees; representation of the Hooters restaurant chain in a highly publicized nationwide class action challenge to the restaurant's female-only hiring policy; and dismissal of all nationwide class claims in a reverse hiring sex discrimination case against Jillian's Entertainment Corp. Ms. Feis also successfully tried the first sexual harassment case to a jury after juries were authorized in Title VII cases upon the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
Ms. Feis is a frequent lecturer on employment law issues, particularly retaliation and sexual harassment, and has conducted extensive sexual harassment training throughout the country. She has also served as defense counsel in mock sexual harassment jury trials in numerous educational programs. Her lectures in this area include presentations to the American Bar Association Equal Employment Opportunity Committee annual meeting, ABA National Institute on Sexual Harassment, the National Employment Law Institute, Management Association of Illinois, Illinois Institute of Continuing Legal Education, Chicago Bar Association, Northwestern University Law School Feminist Symposium, Chicago-Kent College of Law Sexual Harassment Forum, Women's Leadership Coalition Symposium, and numerous client seminars.
Lectures have included topics such as "Jury Trials In Sexual Harassment Cases," "The Use of Psychological Experts in Sexual Harassment Litigation," "Litigating Sexual Harassment Cases," "Investigating Sexual Harassment Claims," "Evidence of Plaintiff's Provocative Behavior in Sexual Harassment Cases," "Responding to Agency Investigations," "Changes in the Law Since Ellerth and Faragher," and annual updates on sexual harassment and retaliation law.
She also has served on the faculty of the National Institute of Trial Advocacy and as a judge for the National Appellate Advocacy Competition. Ms. Feis was a principal collaborator on Seyfarth Shaw LLP's national sexual harassment video training program, "At Issue." She also co-authored IICLE's Sexual Harassment Policy Guidelines. In 1996, Ms. Feis was named in Illinois Legal Times as one of the "Top 15 Rising Star Litigators" in Chicago. In 2007, 2008 and 2009, Ms. Feis has been named as an Illinois Leading Lawyer in the field of Employment Law every year since 2007.
Ms. Feis has searved on the boards of directors of Midwest Young Artists, a nationally acclaimed youth orchestra program, and Jewish Vocational Services, a not-for-profit organization providing job counseling and training to assist individuals in obtaining employment, including seniors, youth, persons with disabilities and the disadvantaged. She is also the Co-Chair of the New Trier Ethical Conduct Global Citizenship Committee.
Education
J.D. -- Duke University School of Law
Editorial Board, Duke Law Journal
B.A. -- Duke University
Summa Cum Laude
Phi Beta Kappa
Admissions
Illinois
U.S. Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit
U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Trial Bar, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Bar Association Memberships
Chicago Bar Association
Illinois State Bar Association
Contact
Tel: 312-431-0888
Fax: 312-431-0228
bfeis@sfltd.com
Suzanne E. Bish
Partner
Suzanne E. Bish is a partner with Stowell & Friedman, Ltd.. Suzanne represents employees seeking to vindicate their civil rights as part of her unwavering commitment to eliminating discrimination in the workplace and in society.
Suzanne has successfully represented victims of discrimination, harassment and retaliation in court and in arbitration, including in trials that resulted in multi-million dollar verdicts for her clients. Suzanne represents employees as individuals and in groups, and has extensive class action litigation experience. Recognizing that the best outcome is often one that avoids litigation, Suzanne regularly assists clients in attaining favorable out-of-court resolutions that further their career and personal goals. Suzanne routinely counsels employees through career issues and transitions and negotiates employment and severance agreements.
Prior to joining Stowell & Friedman, Ltd., Suzanne worked at Sidley Austin LLP, representing corporate and individual clients in large, complex financial and commercial litigation in federal and state court, as well as in arbitration. Much of Suzanne's practice involved representing plaintiffs in financial fraud matters. Suzanne also represented individual executives and board members in governmental and corporate internal investigations and represented criminal defendants and grand-jury targets in white-collar matters.
Suzanne served as a judicial law clerk to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois from 1999-2000.
Prior to attending law school, Suzanne worked as a Certified Public Accountant and auditor for a Big 4 accounting firm in New York, NY.
Suzanne currently serves on the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals Electronic Discovery Pilot Program and recently served as Chair of the Labor & Employment Committee of the Chicago Bar Association.
Suzanne is deeply committed to issues of civil rights and economic justice and has served as a volunteer or board member with a number of organizations dedicated to fair housing, civil rights, and ensuring that all children have safe homes and equal access to educational opportunities.
Education
J.D. -- Ohio State University College of Law, cum laude
Ohio State Law Journal, Articles Editor
B.A.B.S -- Ohio State University, with honors
Admissions
Illinois Supreme Court
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
U.S. Court of Appeals, 2nd and 9th Circuits
Professional Activities
Chicago Bar Association, Employment Law Committee
National Employment Lawyers Association, National and Illinois chapters
Contact
Tel: 312-431-0888
Fax: 312-431-0228
sbish@sfltd.com
Jennifer Schoen Gilbert
Partner
Jennifer Schoen Gilbert is a partner with Stowell & Friedman, Ltd. focusing on employment litigation and representing clients in court as well in arbitration and mediation proceedings. Ms. Gilbert helps her clients get the results they desire both in and out of court.
Her experience is deep and broad, having counseled and represented clients in an array of complex matters, including litigation and/or negotiation regarding claims of discrimination based on race, sex, age, disability and pregnancy as well as representing clients over severance and executive compensation agreements.
Areas of the law in which Ms. Gilbert has successfully prosecuted cases include Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age and Discrimination Employment Act, The Americans with Disabilities Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act and common law claims.
Ms. Gilbert's clients include top Fortune 500 Chief Executive Officers, Chief Operating Officers, top-level managers, brokers and many other individuals whom she has represented. Before joining the Firm, Ms. Gilbert practiced at a nationally recognized Chicago law firm in their Securities & Commodities practice group and was involved in the representation of broker/dealers with respect to a wide range of investor and employee disputes.
Ms. Gilbert works to combine her training and experience in both sides of the industry to help her clients obtain favorable results with the least amount of disruption to their businesses and personal lives.
Ms. Gilbert spends a great deal of her spare time working as an Officer of Teb's Troops, Inc. (www.tebstroops.org) a not-for-profit organization dedicated to funding the fight against melanoma cancer.
Education
J.D. -- Indiana University School of Law-Bloomington
Managing Editor, Indiana Law Journal
B.A. -- Purdue University, 1998, Phi Beta Kappa
NCAA GTE Academic All-American, 1st Team
Admissions
Illinois, Indiana, New York
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Professional Activities
Chicago Bar Association
Illinois State Bar Association
Contact
Tel: 312-431-0888
Fax: 312-431-0228
jgilbert@sfltd.com
George S. Robot
Partner
George S. Robot is a partner with Stowell & Friedman, Ltd. specializing in employment discrimination. He has represented and counseled hundreds of female and minority clients in a wide range of discrimination matters, including landmark lawsuits against Merrill Lynch and Smith Barney.
Originally trained as an engineer, George not only brings legal and trial expertise to plaintiffs' cases, but also technical and analytical expertise critical to winning discrimination cases in today's legal environment.
As electronic discovery has become increasingly prevalent today, not only are plaintiffs confronted with potentially massive amounts of data, but employment discrimination in many instances also has become less overt. Successful prosecution not only requires strong legal and litigation skills but also the technical ability to identify and analyze increasingly large data sets to prove discrimination. George brings unmatched expertise to this aspect of employment law.
As part of his practice, George also regularly represents clients in private arbitration and mediation proceedings as well as before administrative agencies including the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Illinois Department of Labor and Human Rights and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).
Education
J.D. – Chicago-Kent College of Law
B.S. – University of Illinois
Admissions
Illinois
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Trial Bar
Supreme Court of Illinois
Professional Activities
American Bar Association
Illinois State Bar Association
Chicago Bar Association
Contact
Tel: 312-431-0888
Fax: 312-431-0228
grobot@sfltd.com
Tom Shin
Associate
Tom Shin has been an associate with Stowell & Friedman, Ltd. since 2002, assisting clients in a range of employment disputes related to race, gender and other forms of discrimination in the workplace.
In an era of electronically stored information, more and more emphasis has been placed on electronic discovery in litigation. Because extremely large quantities of data are now routinely accessed, collected, reviewed, produced and analyzed, it is essential law for firms to have firm grasp of this electronic discovery process. As a former IT professional with Arthur Andersen, Tom's technical expertise complements his legal training to provide valuable resources to the firm in evaluating data produced during the e-discovery process. These skills are often essential to successfully litigate workplace discrimination.
Tom serves on the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals Electronic Discovery Pilot Program.
Tom has a strong interest in IT networks for which he has received several certifications from Cisco.
Education
J.D. -- IIT/Chicago-Kent College of Law
M.S. – University of Illinois at Chicago (biology)
B.S. – University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (biochemistry)
Admissions
Illinois
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Professional Activities
Illinois State Bar Association
Chicago Bar Association
Chicago Volunteer Legal Services
Center for Disability and Elder Law
Contact
Tel: 312-431-0888
Fax: 312-431-0228
tshin@sfltd.com
"…not so long ago I walked out of Stowell & Friedman, Ltd. for the last time as a client, I will return as a friend.... I shared my heart and soul and in return, they welcomed me, cared for me and helped me when I need them most. I will be forever grateful."
"Your Honor, I just don't know if this is inappropriate, but what I was thinking when we were talking and listening a few minutes ago, I was wondering if it would be out of the realm of possibility to ask everybody to stand up and give [our lawyers a hand]. Can we do that?"
- MR. GILHOOLY (Client)
"I am going to ask you to do that, too." (Applause.)
Over its 20 year history, Stowell & Friedman, Ltd. is proud to have successfully tried or resolved thousands of cases in court or arbitration. The below cases are examples of some of the results we have achieved for our clients.
Gender Discrimination
Cremin v. Merrill Lynch:
- Approximately $250 million paid by Merrill Lynch to current and former female Merrill Lynch Financial Advisors subjected to sex discrimination.
- Negotiated court-approved class action settlement that required class-wide diversity initiatives and ended the firm's policy of mandatory arbitration of civil rights claims for Merrill Lynch employees.
Martens v. Smith Barney:
- Approximately $150 million paid by Smith Barney to Smith Barney female employees who filed claims in the alternative dispute resolution process established by class settlement.
- Negotiated class-wide diversity initiatives as part of court-approved settlement, including hiring and promotion goals and timetables to increase representation of women as Financial Advisors and in management, and to eliminate rampant sexual harassment.
- Won arbitration of class representative Financial Advisor subjected to retaliation.
Sumner v. Merrill Lynch:
- Won award of over $2 million in favor of female Financial Advisor subjected to sexual harassment and sex discrimination. Award established that Merrill Lynch engaged in a nationwide pattern and practice of discrimination against female Financial Advisors in pay and promotional opportunities.
Gould et al. v. Merrill Lynch:
- Won NASD arbitration, resulting in award of over $2 million to Financial Advisor team for gender discrimination and retaliation.
Race Discrimination/National Origin Discrimination
Biondo et al. v. City of Chicago:
- Successfully challenged City of Chicago's discriminatory promotional exam on behalf of approximately 200 Chicago Firefighters.
- Achieved class certification and successfully prosecuted four jury trials leading to a pattern and practice finding and verdicts for back pay, promotions, emotional distress and pension, which were largely upheld by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
- Recovered in excess of $50 million in damages, promotions and pension benefits for class members.
Stevens v. Chicago Board of Education:
- Jury verdict in favor of teacher wrongfully denied contract due to race.
McNabola v. Chicago Transit Authority:
- Jury verdict in favor of doctor wrongfully terminated due to race.
Age Discrimination
Roche et al. v. City of Chicago, Cunningham et al. v. City of Chicago:
- Successfully challenged City of Chicago's mandatory age retirement policy for Exempt Rank (brass) Firefighters.
- Judgment entered in favor of officers with award of full back pay plus interest to unlawfully retired officers, upheld on appeal by Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
- Subsequent lawsuits for additional Firefighters and Police officers settled with entry of judgments in favor of all forced retirees.
Disability Discrimination
Jackson et al. v. City of Chicago and Dexter v. City of Chicago:
- Judgments entered in favor of police applicants with Sickle Cell Disease, Hepatitis B Carrier, and Color Blindness.
Political Affiliation
Wzorek v. City of Chicago:
- Successfully represented pro se plaintiff in damage trial and appeal of political affiliation discrimination claim.
First Amendment
Marshall v. Chicago Housing Authority:
- Successfully represented Chicago Housing Authority lawyers wrongfully terminated and subjected to retaliation after testifying in favor of women lawyers in Cary v. Chicago Housing Authority, a case in which the firm represented and recovered substantial damages for lawyers wrongfully terminated for opposing gender discrimination.
Retaliation
Novissar v. Rollprint:
- Jury verdict in favor of scientist wrongfully terminated due to retaliation for opposing age discrimination.
Fair Labor Standards Act
Dornbos v. County of Cook:
- Jury verdict for County of Cook Bomb Squad for unpaid wages for time spent "on-call."
"I want you to know that you make a big difference in the lives of many people and you might not hear about it…..I am feeling confident and more secure because of the settlement you were able to secure. Thank you!"
Stowell & Friedman's attorneys are committed to representing their clients throughout all facets of their employment relationships including, but not limited to, entering, exiting or transitioning employment. Our attorneys recognize that in many situations clients requiring counseling not only pertaining to their rights, but also regarding how to navigate an employment event which undoubtedly has a significant impact on one's personal life. Our attorneys have been successful at obtaining favorable results with the least amount of disruption to our clients' careers and personal lives.
Among the types of counseling we provide are:
- Contract review and/or negotiations, including offer letters and employment agreements for executives, managers, and other employees;
- Severance agreement review and/or negotiation for executives, managers, and other employees;
- Employee exit strategy;
- Performance reviews, career event, denial of promotion or compensation issues, including denial of overtime compensation;
- Non-compete, non-disclosure and confidentiality clauses;
- Deferred compensation;
- Employee benefits and/or rights, including disability, maternity, paternity, adoption and Family Medical Leave Act;
- Change in control issues;
- Form U-5 issues.
The firm's attorneys have been interviewed by numerous television, radio and print media, including national, local and industry outlets such as CNN, CNBC, CNN, MSNBC, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, BusinessWeek, Fortune Magazine, DOW, Reuters, AP, Bloomberg, DiversityInc., On Wall Street, Registered Representative, Fortune Magazine, USA Today, Daily News, Washington Post, Newsday, ABA Bar Journal, Chicago Tribune, Chicago Sun Times, Crain's Chicago Business, America's Premier Lawyer Series (Top Verdicts), National Public Radio, People Magazine and ABC's 20/20.
On Wall Street, a Question of Bias
Wall Street has long been seen as an exclusive club, and the discrimination suit against Merrill underscores that the industry is still struggling to overcome its reputation as a workplace where only white men are comfortable. Read Full Article
Should Women Run Wall Street?
The New York press has raised the possibility that the overabundance of testosterone on Wall Street drove otherwise intelligent traders and bankers to take the outrageous risks that contributed to the economic collapse.
Read Full Article
Bank of America sued for gender bias
Bank of America Corp. was accused in a Manhattan federal lawsuit of discriminating against female brokers at the former Merrill Lynch & Co. by offering them lower retention bonuses than male counterparts.
Read Full Article
African-American Bias Suite Against Merrill Lynch Gets Revived
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals agreed to hear an appeal on class certification rulings over a race-discrimination suit filed by African-American adviser George McReynolds against Merrill Lynch, now part of Bank of America Corp. (BAC).
Read Full Article
Chicago Bears
Two Illinois Attorneys Teach America's Brokerage houses a Painful Lesson: Discriminate Doesn't Yield Dividends. Read Full Article
Merrill Brokers Urge 7th Circuit to Revive Bonus Bias Action
A lawyer for a putative class of black Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. financial advisers alleging Bank of America Corp.'s bonus system is racially discriminatory told the Seventh Circuit Court that the compensation program is not legally protected. Read Full Article
Linda D. Friedman: Making the World a Better Place for Everyone
Linda D. Friedman was a young plaintiffs' civil rights lawyer when she took on Biondo v. City of Chicago, a class action race discrimination lawsuit involving a group of white Chicago Fire Department firefighters who were denied the opportunity to advance as lieutenants. Read Full Article
Guarding Social Justice and Fair Play
Over the years, Stowell & Friedman, Ltd. has successfully prosecuted civil rights claims for clients from virtually every line of work, including such diverse professions as the elite Cook County Bomb Squad to investment bankers on Wall Street. Read Full Article
Bank of America, Female Brokers Settle Bias Case Over Bonuses
Bank of America Corp has settled a federal lawsuit alleging it discriminated against female brokers at the former Merrill Lynch & Co by offering them lower retention bonuses than male counterparts. Read Full Article
"America's Premier Lawyer Series - Top Verdicts"
In this informative interview, Linda D. Friedman discusses the case of Martens V. Smith, the landmark sexual harassment suit that exposed Smith Barney's notorious "Boom Boom Room" in the Wall Street firm's Garden City, Long Island, branch office. Read Full Article
NASD Awards $2 Million in Bias Case
Three former brokers at Merrill Lynch who complained of sexual discrimination were awarded more than $2 million by NASD, the regulatory organization for the brokerage industry, after two years of arbitration.
Read Full Article
Sex-bias Suit Takes Aim at Accounting Firm's Culture
Armed with a law degree and 11 years of experience as a tax consultant, Melissa Page thought she had the right stuff to become a partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, one of the world's largest public accounting firms. Read Full Article
Accountants Next Target for Underdog & Underdog
What binds Mary Stowell and Linda D. Friedman is their belief in social justice and fair play. They have rattled Wall Street by doggedly pursuing sex-discrimination lawsuits on behalf of hundreds of women employed at the nation's biggest securities firms. Read Full Article
Merrill Lynch Ordered to Pay for Sexual Bias
Merrill Lynch & Company, the nation's biggest brokerage firm, discriminated against women who worked as stockbrokers, according to a panel of arbitrators that has awarded $2.2 million to one of them.
Read Full Article
Jury Gives Firefighters $2.2 million over Exam
A federal jury on Wednesday awarded more than a combined $2.2 million in damages to 10 white Chicago firefighters who were unfairly passed over for promotion to lieutenant despite their higher scores on a 1986 exam.
Read Full Article
CHA Settles '87 Reverse-bias Case
One of the last vestiges of Chicago's bitter Council Wars of the 1980s could soon be laid to rest with the Chicago Housing Authority's agreement to settle a 13-year-old federal lawsuit brought by a security firm whose owners claim they lost CHA business because they were white. Read Full Article
Merrill Lynch Moves to Settle Some Discrimination Claims
Merrill Lynch & Company said that it would begin settlement discussions or seek additional information on about one-third of the 904 sexual discrimination claims filed against it by current or former employees.
Read Full Article
900 Female Brokers File to Join in Case Against Merrill Lynch
Male managers of Merrill Lynch & Co. engaged in a pattern of discrimination that went unchecked for years, according to women seeking to join a class-action lawsuit against the nation's largest brokerage company.
Read Full Article
About 900 Women Will Join Suit Against Merrill Lynch
About 900 women are planning to file claims charging sex discrimination at Merrill Lynch. Nearly 2,900 current and former women brokers at Merrill Lynch are eligible to file. A Federal judge in Chicago gave final approval to a class-action settlement of a case brought by one current and seven former Merrill Lynch brokers. Read Full Article
Fix the System? Or Toss It Entirely?
In 1998, 15 women, all current or former employees of Smith Barney Inc., sat around a conference table in Chicago to talk about why they thought the giant brokerage firm was such an awful place for women to work. There was no shortage of ideas. Read Full Article
Settlement Proposal Is Expected in Women's Suit Against Merrill
Merrill Lynch & Company and lawyers representing several of its female financial consultants are expected to announce in Chicago a proposed settlement of a sexual discrimination lawsuit against the firm. The settlement would allow employees to bring future complaints of discrimination to mediation and then to Federal court. Read Full Article
Smith Barney Plan May be Model
A plan to use mediators from Duke University to help settle employment disputes at Smith Barney Inc. could become a template for the nation's securities industry. Read Full Article
Smith Barney to Settle Sex-bias Lawsuit
Smith Barney Inc. is expected to announce a settlement of a class-action lawsuit that accused the firm of denying women promotions and doing nothing while brokers harassed women employees. Under the settlement, women employees would take their claims to an independent arbitrator outside the securities industry. Read Full Article
Plaintiffs Reach Landmark National Agreement with Smith Barney
Attorneys for an estimated class of 20,000 current and former employees of Smith Barney Inc. announced that they had reached a landmark settlement in their gender discrimination and sexual harassment class action lawsuit filed in May 1996 against the financial services firm Read Full Article
Demanding Right to Sue the Boss
Securities Employees Cannot Pursue Bias, Harassment Claims In Federal Court Because Of Mandatory Arbitration. Women Press Fight For Change.
Read Full Article
Local Law Firm Takes on Big Fish Smith Barney
A small Chicago law firm, which built a reputation with three employment discrimination cases against a local brokerage firm, is now pursuing the nation's second-largest investment house. Read Full Article
Three Women vs. a Broker; Olde Is Accused of Job Discrimination
Less than a year ago, Mary Graf was at the top of her professional game. Of the more than 1,000 brokers at the Olde Discount Corporation, Ms. Graf, who had been with the company for 11 years, led the list of big bond sellers in the latest company newsletter. Read Full Article
Largest Award Settlements
Stowell and Friedman Ltd. make the list at number 43 of the Largest Award Settlements in 2006, published by Pennsylvania Law Weekly. Their work on the Gould v. Merrill Lynch & Co. case garnered $2 million through arbitration. Read Full Article
Stowell & Friedman, Ltd. is committed to the fight for legislative change to benefit the victims of workplace discrimination. Through its ongoing lobbying efforts, the firm has fought for change through the Civil Rights Tax Relief Act, Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009, Arbitration Fairness Act, and the fight for non-taxable status for emotional distress damages.
Civil Rights Tax Relief Act
Stowell & Friedman, Ltd. attorneys and clients met with members of Congress to lobby in favor of the Civil Rights Tax Relief Act, which passed on October 11, 2004. This ended the "double taxation" on attorneys' fees and costs for employees who win lawsuits or settle employment discrimination cases, allowing those employees to deduct fees and costs paid to their attorneys rather than incurring tax liability that often exceeded their recovery.
"We are absolutely delighted that Congress has seen fit to remove this unfair tax burden from those who encounter workplace discrimination."- Bruce Fredrickson, Vice-President of Public Policy for the National Employment Lawyers Association (NELA)
Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009
Clients and attorneys from Stowell & Friedman, Ltd. met with members of Congress to lobby for passage of the Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009, which was signed into law on January 29, 2009. The Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 restores the law so that employees who receive ongoing diminished pay due to past discrimination can challenge their discriminatory pay. Through its lobbying efforts Stowell & Friedman, Ltd. and its clients helped to put a human face on the cost of unequal pay and pay discrimination.
Arbitration Fairness Act
Clients and attorneys from Stowell & Friedman, Ltd. met with members of Congress to support employees' access to federal court for civil rights violations. Bolstered by recent Supreme Court decisions in favor of large employers, employees have increasingly been forced to forfeit their rights to challenge civil rights violations in court and instead must submit to private, binding mandatory arbitration, a forum that greatly limits employees' access to evidence and due process protections.
Non-taxable Status for Emotional Distress Damages Awarded for Civil Rights Violations
Stowell & Friedman, Ltd. attorneys and clients have met with members of Congress in Washington, D.C. as part of an ongoing effort to achieve non-taxable status for emotional distress damages awarded to make victims "whole" for civil rights violations. While legislative change has not yet occurred, the firm will continue to fight for change for those who have been victimized by workplace discrimination and may be taxed on emotional distress damages.


